議論文

“Candidates who take a firm stance and stick to it usually score higher.”

“It could be argued that grades matter more than real learning.”

“We should weigh up the pros and cons of the new policy.”

“Candidates must substantiate their claim with real examples.”

“I concede that the current system is far from perfect.”

“She put forward a compelling argument for equal pay.”

“Let me play devil's advocate just for a moment.”

“On balance, the benefits far outweigh the costs.”

“A strong essay should address the counterargument directly.”

“Whether it helps is a moot point after all this time.”

“One extra fact can tip the balance of the argument.”

“Claiming all teens are lazy is a sweeping generalization.”

“Statistics give weight to the writer's argument.”

“The crux of the matter is whether students can focus.”

“They changed their minds in the face of strong criticism.”

“The government held its ground on the new policy.”

“The essay only touches on the economic side of the issue.”

“Privacy online is a gray area for many people.”

“Each paragraph should advance the argument one step further.”

“This result begs the question: who is really to blame?”

“I take issue with the idea that money buys happiness.”

“The editorial calls for stronger measures.”

“Skipping school to study for a test uses the view that the ends justify the means.”

“It stands to reason that sleep affects examination performance.”

“What matters most is the quality of the argument.”